@epsteinpedia
CA:
AEb4NmMJF2x5kcp19M13RiXZuAGyajWSKLaioqBrpump
Document 2020-0003388-AEN
AI Analysis
Summary: Juror ID 50 was asked a series of questions regarding their ability to assess the credibility of witnesses claiming sexual assault or abuse and whether they or someone they know has been a victim of sexual harassment or abuse. The juror's responses are not provided in the given snippet.
Significance: This document is a juror questionnaire that assesses the juror's ability to remain impartial when faced with testimony about sexual assault or abuse, and whether their personal experiences may impact their judgment.
Key Topics:
Juror impartiality
Sexual assault/abuse testimony
Personal experience with sexual harassment/abuse
Full Text
Case#: 2020-0003388-AEN Document#: 64123-11 Filed: 2023/02/22 Page: 326 of 480
Juror ID: 50
47. Witnesses in this case may testify claiming sexual abuse or sexual assault. Would you have any difficulty assessing the credibility of a witness claiming sexual assault or abuse just like you would any other witness?
Yes No
47a. If yes, please explain:
48. Have you or a friend or family member ever been the victim of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual assault? (This includes actual or attempted sexual assault or other unwanted sexual advance, including by a stranger, acquaintance, supervisor, teacher, or family member.)
Yes (self) Yes (friend or family member) No
48a. If yes, without listing names, please explain:
48b. If your answer to 48 was yes, do you believe that this would affect your ability to serve fairly and impartially as a juror in this case?
Yes No
48c. If yes to 48b, please explain:
-24-
DOJ-OGR-00009781