@epsteinpedia
CA:
AEb4NmMJF2x5kcp19M13RiXZuAGyajWSKLaioqBrpump
Document A-5643
AI Analysis
Summary: The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness named Conrad is being questioned about their understanding of a judge's inquiry regarding their finances and the appointment of a lawyer. The witness confirms understanding the connection between the two topics. The transcript is part of a larger legal case involving Paul M. Daugerdas in the United States of America.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the witness's understanding of a judicial inquiry and their connection to a legal proceeding involving Paul M. Daugerdas.
Key Topics:
connection between financial discussion and lawyer appointment
witness understanding of judicial inquiry
Key People:
- Conrad - witness being deposed
- Judge Pauley - judge asking questions during a proceeding
Full Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
February 15, 2012
Page 133
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct
1 Q. So my question is, did you understand at that moment that
2 there was a logical connection between the question Judge
3 Pauley was asking you about your finances and the matter he was
4 discussing with you, that is, appointment of a lawyer?
5 A. Yes, sir.
...
Page 136
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct
...
25 A. I don't know what your question means.
Page 133 - Page 136 (34)
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS
DOJ-OGR-00009926