Case 1:20cr00330 Document 612 Filed 02/24/22 Page 103 of 130 A-5788
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 331
1 A. I'm not sure I understand --
2 MR. SCHECTMAN: May I be heard? I object to same name
3 for her father. No one knew her father's name, so I object to
4 that.
5 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Very well.
7 Q. You reviewed the Westlaw report, correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Did you discuss it with Susan Brune?
10 A. No.
11 Q. Did you discuss it with Theresa Trzaskoma?
12 A. No.
13 Q. Whom did you discuss it with?
14 A. I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco.
15 Q. Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had
16 had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms.
17 Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended
18 attorney?
19 A. I discussed several of the e-mail exchanges, but he was
20 only on a number of them.
21 Q. Did you see the May 12 series of e-mail exchanges involving
22 Theresa Trzaskoma including the Jesus e-mail before Theresa
23 Trzaskoma took part in the July 15 court conference?
24 A. No.
25 Q. When did you see that e-mail?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009392
@epsteinpedia
CA:
AEb4NmMJF2x5kcp19M13RiXZuAGyajWSKLaioqBrpump
Document A-5788
AI Analysis
Summary: The witness testifies that they discussed a Westlaw report with their partner Randy Kim, but did not discuss it with Susan Brune or Theresa Trzaskoma. The witness also states they did not see certain email exchanges until after a court conference.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the testimony of a witness regarding their knowledge of email exchanges related to the identification of Juror No. 1.
Key Topics:
witness testimony
Juror No. 1 identification
email exchanges
Key People:
- Randy Kim - partner of the witness
- Theresa Trzaskoma - involved in email exchanges about Juror No. 1
- Susan Brune - mentioned as someone the witness did not discuss the Westlaw report with
Full Text
Case 1:20cr00330 Document 612 Filed 02/24/22 Page 103 of 130 A-5788
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 331
1 A. I'm not sure I understand --
2 MR. SCHECTMAN: May I be heard? I object to same name
3 for her father. No one knew her father's name, so I object to
4 that.
5 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Very well.
7 Q. You reviewed the Westlaw report, correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Did you discuss it with Susan Brune?
10 A. No.
11 Q. Did you discuss it with Theresa Trzaskoma?
12 A. No.
13 Q. Whom did you discuss it with?
14 A. I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco.
15 Q. Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had
16 had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms.
17 Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended
18 attorney?
19 A. I discussed several of the e-mail exchanges, but he was
20 only on a number of them.
21 Q. Did you see the May 12 series of e-mail exchanges involving
22 Theresa Trzaskoma including the Jesus e-mail before Theresa
23 Trzaskoma took part in the July 15 court conference?
24 A. No.
25 Q. When did you see that e-mail?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009392
--- PAGE BREAK ---
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 331
1 A. I'm not sure I understand --
2 MR. SCHECTMAN: May I be heard? I object to same name
3 for her father. No one knew her father's name, so I object to
4 that.
5 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Very well.
7 Q. You reviewed the Westlaw report, correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Did you discuss it with Susan Brune?
10 A. No.
11 Q. Did you discuss it with Theresa Trzaskoma?
12 A. No.
13 Q. Whom did you discuss it with?
14 A. I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco.
15 Q. Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had
16 had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms.
17 Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended
18 attorney?
19 A. I discussed several of the e-mail exchanges, but he was
20 only on a number of them.
21 Q. Did you see the May 12 series of e-mail exchanges involving
22 Theresa Trzaskoma including the Jesus e-mail before Theresa
23 Trzaskoma took part in the July 15 court conference?
24 A. No.
25 Q. When did you see that e-mail?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010071
Individual Pages
Page 103 - DOJ-OGR-00009392
Page 331 - DOJ-OGR-00010071
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 331
1 A. I'm not sure I understand --
2 MR. SCHECTMAN: May I be heard? I object to same name
3 for her father. No one knew her father's name, so I object to
4 that.
5 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Very well.
7 Q. You reviewed the Westlaw report, correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Did you discuss it with Susan Brune?
10 A. No.
11 Q. Did you discuss it with Theresa Trzaskoma?
12 A. No.
13 Q. Whom did you discuss it with?
14 A. I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco.
15 Q. Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had
16 had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms.
17 Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended
18 attorney?
19 A. I discussed several of the e-mail exchanges, but he was
20 only on a number of them.
21 Q. Did you see the May 12 series of e-mail exchanges involving
22 Theresa Trzaskoma including the Jesus e-mail before Theresa
23 Trzaskoma took part in the July 15 court conference?
24 A. No.
25 Q. When did you see that e-mail?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010071