C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 366
1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.
2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:
4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime
5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the
6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that
7 correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.
10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any
12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was
13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?
14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,
15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared
16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing
17 information during the course of the trial. But I have
18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.
19 THE COURT: Anything further?
20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.
22 (Witness excused)
23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the
24 same law firm.
25 BARRY H. BERKE,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010106
@epsteinpedia
CA:
AEb4NmMJF2x5kcp19M13RiXZuAGyajWSKLaioqBrpump
Document A-5823
AI Analysis
Summary: The transcript captures the redirect examination of Mr. Schoeman, where he discusses a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1's status as a suspended attorney. The court and attorneys explore the context and significance of this conversation. The witness is then excused, and the next witness, Barry Berke, is called.
Significance: This document reveals a potentially sensitive conversation between trial team members and sheds light on their deliberative process, which may be relevant to the case's outcome or potential appeals.
Key Topics:
Juror No. 1's status
Information sharing between trial team members
Witness testimony
Key People:
- Mr. Schoeman - witness
- Ms. Trzaskoma - trial team member who shared information with Mr. Schoeman
- Mr. Shechtman - attorney conducting redirect examination
- Barry Berke - attorney who is called to testify next
Full Text
C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 366
1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.
2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:
4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime
5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the
6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that
7 correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.
10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any
12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was
13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?
14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,
15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared
16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing
17 information during the course of the trial. But I have
18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.
19 THE COURT: Anything further?
20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.
22 (Witness excused)
23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the
24 same law firm.
25 BARRY H. BERKE,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010106
--- PAGE BREAK ---
Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 83 of 117
A-5823
C2rdaU4 Schoeman - cross 366
1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.
2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:
4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.
10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?
14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We, having spent many months of trial together, often shared information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial. But I have described I think the entirety of the conversation.
19 THE COURT: Anything further?
20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down. (Witness excused)
23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the same law firm.
24 BARRY H. BERKE,
25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009427
Individual Pages
Page 8 - DOJ-OGR-00010106
Page 83 - DOJ-OGR-00009427
Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 83 of 117
A-5823
C2rdaU4 Schoeman - cross 366
1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.
2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:
4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.
10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?
14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We, having spent many months of trial together, often shared information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial. But I have described I think the entirety of the conversation.
19 THE COURT: Anything further?
20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down. (Witness excused)
23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the same law firm.
24 BARRY H. BERKE,
25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009427