@epsteinpedia
CA:
AEb4NmMJF2x5kcp19M13RiXZuAGyajWSKLaioqBrpump
Document A-5834
AI Analysis
Summary: The court concludes an evidentiary hearing with all parties resting their cases. The judge requests post-hearing briefs on the strongest results of the hearing and the ethical obligations of certain attorneys regarding disclosure of a letter and investigation into a juror.
Significance: This document marks the conclusion of an evidentiary hearing and outlines the next steps in the legal proceedings, including post-hearing briefing on key issues.
Key Topics:
conclusion of evidentiary hearing
post-hearing briefing schedule
ethical obligations of attorneys
Key People:
- THE COURT - presiding judge
- MR. SHECTMAN - attorney for defendant Parse
- MS. MCCARTHY - attorney for defendant Field
- MR. ROTERT - attorney for unspecified defendant
- MR. SKLARSKY - attorney for unspecified defendant
- MR. OKULA - government attorney
Full Text
C2grdau4
377
1 THE COURT: Does the defendant Parse rest?
2 MR. SHECTMAN: We do, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: Does any defendant have any additional
4 evidence to offer to the Court on this hearing?
5 MS. MCCARTHY: Not from Mr. Field, your Honor.
6 MR. ROTERT: We do not, your Honor.
7 MR. SKLARSKY: No, your Honor.
8 THE COURT: Does the government have anything further?
9 MR. OKULA: Thank you, your Honor. We do not.
10 THE COURT: The government rests?
11 MR. OKULA: We do indeed, your Honor.
12 THE COURT: I would like to get some post-hearing
13 briefing from the parties. It seems to me that the simplest
14 way to do it would be to have the parties submit simultaneous
15 briefs and then I give you a very short responsive brief if you
16 felt it was necessary to respond to something that the other
17 side said. We'll fix a schedule in a moment.
18 Obviously, in the briefs I want the parties to provide
19 the Court with what they believe the strongest results are of
20 this evidentiary hearing. Second, in the post-hearing briefs
21 I'd like the question of whether the attorneys for Brune &
22 Richard involved in this matter would have satisfied their
23 ethical obligations if they failed to disclose the contents of
24 the July 21 letter and their complete investigation into Juror
25 No. 1.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010117