@epsteinpedia
CA:
AEb4NmMJF2x5kcp19M13RiXZuAGyajWSKLaioqBrpump
Document DOJ-OGR-00030482
AI Analysis
Summary: Attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt argues that a felony aggravated assault plea is unwarranted and may lead to sex offender classification, instead recommending a misdemeanor plea to solicitation based on the case's circumstances and evidence.
Significance: This document reveals the defense strategy and negotiations in a criminal case, highlighting concerns about sex offender classification and the credibility of witnesses.
Key Topics:
Plea negotiation
Sex offender classification
Criminal defense strategy
Key People:
- Gerald B. Lefcourt - Attorney for the client
- Lanna Belohlavek - Recipient of the letter, likely a prosecutor or another attorney
Full Text
LAW OFFICES OF
Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C.
Ms. Lanna Belohlavek
June 5, 2006
Page 7
IV. Conclusion
Under the circumstances of this case a plea to felony aggravated assault is both unwarranted and presents a grave risk the client will be brandished a sex offender, bearing the attendant burdens inherent with that classification. In light of this, and the credibility issues presented by the complaining witnesses, combined with the client's two psycho-sexual evaluations and lie detector tests, we believe that at the very most, a misdemeanor plea to solicitation is appropriate.
Very truly yours,
Gerald B. Lefcourt
07/26/17 80 'd
FAX NO. 5168336918 Page 15 of 131
Public Redacted Version 10/30/2006 900001-NOR